MVP. Get rid of it?

[.PheNoMaGiC.]

I think this MVP thing is the dumbest thing ever. They always give it to the loosing team and a kid that had like 5 kills. I think it should be done away with.
What is you say?

[uncrwndking]

I think it's a cool feature. I have no problem with it.

[Tattie]

I really like the idea but It doesnt work well in my opinion. I think it is based on Kill when it should be based on Kill/Death Ratio.

Tattie

[killa mirage]

I think people are capable of determining mvp by themselves.

[uncrwndking]

Originally Posted by Tattie

I really like the idea but It doesnt work well in my opinion. I think it is based on Kill when it should be based on Kill/Death Ratio.

Tattie

K/D ratio would work better IMO. I can go 20-49 and get MPV which is gay.

[CiphA]

MVP- Most Vulnerable Player.

I thought this was figured out awhile ago?

[E z e k i e l]

Ive had most time in the hill, 60 something, most kills, +20 or something, and some kid that goes -5 and gets 10 seconds on the other team gets MVP.

I think its just broke.

[killa mirage]

Originally Posted by CiphA

MVP- Most Vulnerable Player.

I thought this was figured out awhile ago?

I'm not sure if that was a joke or if that's really what it means.

[Tedums]

They should fix it, not get rid of it.

For slayer, it should be the player who was most positive, to k/d ratio, because 8 kills 1 death is not as good as 15 kills 2 deaths.

For skirmish, it should be the most objective player on the winning team.

[Trouble]

I like it a lot becuz i usually trie to get it "idk y though"
but i like it
and i know wut u meen sometimes it does give it to some1 who had like 5 kills and 10 deaths
but if it was like KOTH they prolly had a lot of time